Continue reading...
-d '{"x": 450, "y": 320, "screenshot": {"markup": ["clickable", "typeable"]}}'
，详情可参考搜狗浏览器
For Cardozo, Mrs. Palsgraf’s claim failed for a more fundamental reason than want of proximate cause: The train attendant’s negligence toward the boarding youth was not negligent toward Mrs. Palsgraf, since she was not a foreseeable victim.78 “Negligence . . . is . . . a term of relation”79: To commit the tort of negligence is to (foreseeably) injure someone by breaching a duty to take reasonable care as to her. More generally, unless a defendant breaches a duty owed to the plaintiff — that is, commits a wrong against her — the Palsgraf perspective maintains that the plaintiff cannot recover for any resulting injuries, because redressing relational wrongs is tort law’s fundamental purpose.，更多细节参见谷歌
22:36, 9 марта 2026Россия
Sponsored access to AI tooling for contributors and maintainers